maybe there are different versions of her, and instead of calling this one “milena 2.0″ or “milena 3.0″ (that software nomenclature is so over-used and cliché), the powers that be chose to call this “milena B” in order to differentiate her from the other versions (such as milena A, milena C, milena D, etc)?? did you ever think of that?
and are you the real attu, or are you the imposter?
Attu
September 20th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Why milena B, iveta B, carina A, chiara A. Why don’t they use a familyname or get rid of it alltogether? Just an initial is just stupid.
wtf
September 21st, 2008 at 4:19 am
maybe there are different versions of her, and instead of calling this one “milena 2.0″ or “milena 3.0″ (that software nomenclature is so over-used and cliché), the powers that be chose to call this “milena B” in order to differentiate her from the other versions (such as milena A, milena C, milena D, etc)?? did you ever think of that?
and are you the real attu, or are you the imposter?
Attu
September 21st, 2008 at 2:10 pm
No I am the real Attu, not the imposter. So Attu A and not Attu B. Hmmpff, there is no Attu A or Attu B, there’s only one Attu…